How Did Jewish Women Know When To Light Shabbat Candles in the 18th C.?
(Please click on any image to enlarge.)
In today’s age we are extremely punctilious when it comes to various zemanim (assigned times). Take Shabbat, for example—we begin and end at a precise minute, and one that varies from week to week. I always wondered, however, exactly how did people know when to light Shabbat candles in an era before clocks and watches were household items. I assume most people did not own a sundial and you can’t always rely on the skies. So how did they know it was 4:53 pm and time to light the candles? Or that the eighteen minutes were up and you had to park your horse and walk home?
A few years ago I discovered the answer of how they knew the difference between 4:53 and 5:07.
Answer: they couldn’t tell the difference.
Among the supplementary matter is a table (no. 8) to determine “the Hour to commence the Sabbath, in the City New-York,” which “may, with a small variation, answer well for all the Northern States of America.” It was originally compiled in 1759 by Joseph Jeshurun Pinto, the hazzan (leader) of New York’s Cong. Shearith Israel.** Note how inexact the times are (right-side page)!
One might be tempted to conclude that the crudeness of the calendar is due to the fact that it was produced by a frontier community whose members were incapable of calculating a more precise table. In fact, the schedule prepared by Pinto remained the standard one for all American Jews—Sephardim, Central Europeans and East Europeans alike—into the twentieth century.
When Isaac Leeser commenced publication of his monthly Occident and American Jewish Advocate in 1843, he included a Jewish calendar. Although it was prepared for publication by the Jacob Ezekiel of Richmond, the Sabbath times (in the third column) are identical to those established by Pinto. (Pinto is not acknowledged here). This schedule continued to appear in the Occident’s calendars until it ceased publication in 1869 (neither Pinto nor Ezekiel were acknowledged after 1843).


(Note that Leeser distinguished between the starting times according to "Minhag Sephardim" and "German Jews"?)
Eleven years after the Occident first appeared, Leeser heralded the publication of A Jewish Calendar for Fifty Years in a book review, noting that it “has been looked for by many for some time past with anxiety, the old book of Mr. Moses Lopez, of Newport, being long since inaccessible, besides its time being nearly run out.”***
This 1854 calendar indicates that Pinto's schedule was still in force, at it was included in the in the communal register section in the synagogue listings of the two co-authors (New York's Shearith Israel, where Lyons ministered, and Montreal's Shearith Israel, where de Sola was the leader.)

(There is one minor difference in the dates of the schedule as used by the two congregations.)
I’ve seen dozens of Jewish calendars published between 1854 and the close of the century, and all (perhaps with one exception*****) continued to use Pinto’s schedule (without any attribution). Some calendars used the the times, but paired them with a lectionary rather than with Gregorian dates.
And just one more thing: that ubiquitous Sabbath schedule prepared by Pinto may have been more (or worse) than imprecise. According to the “official” history of Shearith Israel:
_____________________________
* I have been unable to identify this Moses Lopez. There is a Moses Lopez (nephew of Aaron Lopez) who moved to New York in 1822 and is remembered as “the last Jew of Newport,” but it is not known whether these two individuals are really one and the same. Note that Lopez who moved to New York was described as mathematician in Edward Peterson, History of Rhode Island (New York: John S. Taylor, 1853), 181-82.
** On Pinto, who should not be confused with Isaac Pinto (author of the “Pinto Prayer Book”), see H. P. Salomon, “Joseph Jeshurun Pinto (1729-1782): A Dutch Hazzan in Colonial New York,” Studia Rosenthaliana 13.1 (Jan. 1979), 18-29. He was the author of the first Jewish publication in America (click here).
*** Occident 12.6 (Sep. 1854), 320. The calendar was printed in Montreal, but in the particular copy pictured here a Bloch label was pasted over the original imprint information. The volume contained the first (?) detailed description of the Jewish calendar in English and the first communal register of American Jewry.
**** David and Tamar de Sola Pool, An Old Faith in the New World: Portrait of Shearith Israel, 1654-1954 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1955), 165.
***** I think I may have seen one calendar with more specific Shabbat times, but I am unable to recall the particular edition.
In today’s age we are extremely punctilious when it comes to various zemanim (assigned times). Take Shabbat, for example—we begin and end at a precise minute, and one that varies from week to week. I always wondered, however, exactly how did people know when to light Shabbat candles in an era before clocks and watches were household items. I assume most people did not own a sundial and you can’t always rely on the skies. So how did they know it was 4:53 pm and time to light the candles? Or that the eighteen minutes were up and you had to park your horse and walk home?
A few years ago I discovered the answer of how they knew the difference between 4:53 and 5:07.
Answer: they couldn’t tell the difference.
* * *
A calendar with corresponding civil and Jewish dates is an essential household and congregational item as Jewish holidays and observances fall on different civil dates each year. It is thus no surprise that the second book published for American Jewry was Moses Lopez’s fifty-four-year calendar (1806).*When Isaac Leeser commenced publication of his monthly Occident and American Jewish Advocate in 1843, he included a Jewish calendar. Although it was prepared for publication by the Jacob Ezekiel of Richmond, the Sabbath times (in the third column) are identical to those established by Pinto. (Pinto is not acknowledged here). This schedule continued to appear in the Occident’s calendars until it ceased publication in 1869 (neither Pinto nor Ezekiel were acknowledged after 1843).
Eleven years after the Occident first appeared, Leeser heralded the publication of A Jewish Calendar for Fifty Years in a book review, noting that it “has been looked for by many for some time past with anxiety, the old book of Mr. Moses Lopez, of Newport, being long since inaccessible, besides its time being nearly run out.”***
I’ve seen dozens of Jewish calendars published between 1854 and the close of the century, and all (perhaps with one exception*****) continued to use Pinto’s schedule (without any attribution). Some calendars used the the times, but paired them with a lectionary rather than with Gregorian dates.
The calendar by which to this day [1955!] the congregation [Shearith Israel] sets the time of its Sabbath eve services was drawn up by him in an approximate adaptation of the calendar used in the parent congregation in Amsterdam. He was neither an astronomer, however, nor even a geographer, and the times set in his calendar not infrequently vary rather widely from the times of sunset in New York.(For more history/bibliography posts, click here.)
_____________________________
* I have been unable to identify this Moses Lopez. There is a Moses Lopez (nephew of Aaron Lopez) who moved to New York in 1822 and is remembered as “the last Jew of Newport,” but it is not known whether these two individuals are really one and the same. Note that Lopez who moved to New York was described as mathematician in Edward Peterson, History of Rhode Island (New York: John S. Taylor, 1853), 181-82.
** On Pinto, who should not be confused with Isaac Pinto (author of the “Pinto Prayer Book”), see H. P. Salomon, “Joseph Jeshurun Pinto (1729-1782): A Dutch Hazzan in Colonial New York,” Studia Rosenthaliana 13.1 (Jan. 1979), 18-29. He was the author of the first Jewish publication in America (click here).
*** Occident 12.6 (Sep. 1854), 320. The calendar was printed in Montreal, but in the particular copy pictured here a Bloch label was pasted over the original imprint information. The volume contained the first (?) detailed description of the Jewish calendar in English and the first communal register of American Jewry.
**** David and Tamar de Sola Pool, An Old Faith in the New World: Portrait of Shearith Israel, 1654-1954 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1955), 165.
***** I think I may have seen one calendar with more specific Shabbat times, but I am unable to recall the particular edition.

13 Comments:
my son asked me that question recently.. I told him they probably had to estimate and they could not know exactly.. like hte gemara says about erev pesach, a person can make a mistake in time between the 4th and 5th hour of the day, but they would not mistake the 4th and 6th hours... so it was done by estimation I think...
and from the shulchan aruch one can assume they did not do it by actual time, but by candle-lighting for example it says the amount of time to walk 3/4 mil - so they had to estimate the amount of time it would take to walk that far and that is when they lit candles. That is why it does not just say 18 minutes.
Fascinating. I have always marveled at the modern obsession with precise times (other than for train -- really stagecoach -- connections for which they were first used). I don't even wear a watch.
What was the first book published for Jews in America?
See Aishel Avrohom (Butshatsh) OC 89:1.
MB says to light 'when the sun hits the tops of the trees'.
wow.
R. Ovadia Yosef writes, explaining the 5 hr an a little bit opinion of waiting between meat and milk, that this view is not found until the period of the aharonim, and the explanation for it found in the Chid"a in Mahaziq Berakah is not the one most people today give, that the Rambam writes "ki-shesh".
R. Ovadia himself explains that the reason for the 5+ view and the Rambam's language is that people did not have clocks so they estimated the amount of time that had elapsed since they ate meat -there was no problem if they were an hr or so off.
(Although this is in the realm of minhag, albeit an important one, shabbat candle lighting touches on Torah law.)
See Yalqut Yosef to relevant siman in Y.D.
I forwarded this to the current rabbi of Shearith Israel in New York and he found it fascinating.
Nice of you to display Pinto's work openly on your website, so people can refer to it - it certainly saves us the trouble! Hazzan Pinto was an important figure here at Cong. Shearith Israel, the Spanish & Portuguese synagogue in New York, and he already at that time in the 1730s/1740s or so was probably following Saul Pardo ("Saul Brown" was how he translated his name in English) who probably was from Amsterdam and served here in New York in the 1690s before he finally settled in Curacao. But getting back to Pinto, few realize that, according to our congregant, Professor Herman Salomon of SUNY Albany, he went back to England and eventually made his way back to Amsterdam, where he wrote a manual for hazzanim (in Portuguese)that has notes on tefilla practices in New York, London, and Amsterdam in those days. That work awaits a full translation and explanation. Professor Salomon also mentions another work of Pinto's which may have existed in Shearith Israel's archives as recently as during the days of Rev. David de Sola Pool but which subsequently seems to have been lost.
-Ira L. Rohde, Hazan
Congregation Shearith Israel
The Spanish & Portuguese Synagogue in the City of New York
8 West 70th St.
New York, NY 10023
An important point to bear in mind is that this was before the introduction of Railroad Time, so longitude was not an issue in the calculation of zemanim. Only latitude was an issue, and the variation in latitude in the geographic range given isn't that great. New-York is 40.7°N, Richmond is 37.5°. That's only a range of 3 degrees, and the maximum difference in sunset is less than 10 minutes (i.e. at midwinter the sun sets at New-York < 10 min before it sets at Richmond, and at midsummer it sets at New-York < 10 min after it sets at Richmond). Boston is at 42.3°N, and the maximum difference between sunset there and at New-York is a mere 7 minutes.
Thus, times calculated for NY could be safely applied over a wide geographical range, especially when they're only given to a precision of half an hour. It's mainly the introduction of Railroad Time, which artificially caused zemanim to vary by longitude, that created the need for each location to have its own chart calculated.
I've looked up the times of sunset for the latitude of New-York, for the dates given, to see whether they make any sense. They don't, much. For much of the year these times give one a healthy safety margin of more than half an hour, but some of them cut it very close, and in one case go over! On 1 Nov, at the latitude of New-York, sunset is at 4:56pm, and yet the chart says that from 8-Oct to 1-Nov shabbat should be brought in at 5:00! After Shabbos I'll try different latitudes and see if I can come up with some kind of explanation, but for now I'm confuzzled.
The imprecision of the times is acknowledged in the article by Prof. H.P. Salomon from Studia Rosenthaliana that you have noted in your double-asterisked footnote, and the conclusion stated there was that it seems to have been adapted by estimation from similar tables from Amsterdam (although they obviously knew Amsterdam and London were much further north and had much wider variations in time). My apologies for my mistake in the dates for this particular Hazan Pinto, who was here in the late 1750-s to the 1760's, and not twenty years earlier as I stated in my earlier posting. I might add that Pinto's times were also used historically as a timetable as to when the minyan should begin evening services at Shearith Israel. Would that help explain the lack of a need for precision? Presumably, the men would have to leave the house earlier than that to get to synagogue by these times, and it could be assumed that the women might light candles before their menfolk left the house to get to tefilla on time (and, from what I know of the Spanish-Portuguese, it was important for them to get to services promptly and to begin tefilla on time).
-Ira L. Rohde, Hazan
Congregation Shearith Israel
New York, NY
i sent an email
Fantastic post!
Just a couple of weeks ago we ate "Leil Shabbat" at Yeminite neighbors, and they told us that in Yemen Shabbat started very early. It's considered a mitzvah to enlarge Shabbat. They continued the custome after aliyah and said that they were be returning from Beit Knesset "in Shabbat" before the Ashkenazim even lit candles.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home